Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Amelie Van Impe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hennemann vs Impe analysis and find out who is favored!
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Amelie Van Impe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hennemann 1 - 0 Impe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hennemann has won 46.62% of points on their second serve, while Impe has won 39.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hennemann, in recent form, has won 59.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Impe has won 53.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 50.21% and 34.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hennemann has saved 54.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Impe has saved 52.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hennemann has won 68.35% of matches played (W/L 54/ 25), with Impe winning 59.57% (W/L 28/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 127/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17). Impe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 23/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18), where as Impe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.61% of matches (W/L 16/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hennemann winning 1 times and Impe being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hennemann winning 2 and Impe winning 0. The last match between Hennemann and Impe was at the W25 Eupen, 03-08-2022, First, Clay with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hennemann and Impe have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hennemann winning 0 times and Impe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hennemann winning 0, and Impe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hennemann has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.84 while Impe has played against players with an average rank of 162.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hennemann has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Impe has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hennemann has converted 54.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Impe has converted 48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
394
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
527
Rank
456
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
63% (168-98)
Career Total W/L
63% (73-42)
79% (34-9)
YTD W/L
29% (2-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Amelie Van Impe For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hennemann VS Impe
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Amelie Van Impe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:0 | 1:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (40/62) | 56% (29/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (26/40) | 69% (20/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (15/22) | 26% (6/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (26/52) | 34% (21/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Amelie Van Impe
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Amelie Van Impe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 79% (34/9) | 29% (2/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 77% (72/21) | 33% (6/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (514/333) | 44% (78/99) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 89% (8/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 81% (22/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:19 | 1:52:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 310.14 | 270.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1792/2575) | 73% (370/508) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1103/1792) | 59% (220/370) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (365/783) | 40% (55/138) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (219/402) | 48% (24/50) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (1304/2449) | 42% (204/486) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (10/6) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 92% (22/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 79% (34/43) | 29% (2/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (36/33) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (36/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 33% (6/2) |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
70%
(
76 of
109)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
55 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Pemra Ozgen
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Draginja Vukovic
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Natalija Senic
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mana Kawamura
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Irina Fetecau
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elena Malygina
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Amelie Van Impe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yaroslava Bartashevich
Player
Amelie Van Impe
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Amelie Van Impe
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
10
Total Points Won
11
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Amelie Van Impe
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Sina Herrmann
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Amelie Van Impe
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
83)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Laura Hietaranta
79%
(
81 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Amelie Van Impe
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
82%
(
62 of
76)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Amelie Van Impe
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cagla Buyukakcay
Player
Amelie Van Impe
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Hennemann Vs Impe Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hennemann are available here and Impe photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
